NFT art has exploded in popularity, but it faces an uncertain future on Wikipedia.
Editors of the online encyclopedia recently voted against categorizing non-fungible tokens as art. The result sparked fury in thecryptocommunity.
The poll stemmed from discussions aboutWikipedia’s listof the most expensive artworks by living artists,Cointelegraph reports.
The editors debated whether NFTs such as Murat Pak’s $91.8MThe Mergeand Beeple’s $69MEverydaysshould join the list. A majority of editors have voted against their inclusion.
The 💜 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol' founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
While the result isn’t binding and involves a single Wikipedia page, the vote has caused consternation among NFT advocates.
Duncan Cock Foster, the cofounder of NFT marketplace Nifty Gateway, described the situation as an “art emergency.”
He warned that Wikipedia’s decision could deprive digital artists of their legitimacy:
Wikipedia works off of precedent. If NFTs are classified as ‘not art’ on this page, then they will be classified as ‘not art’ on the rest of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is the global source of truth for many around the world. The stakes couldn’t be higher!
? Art Emergency!! ?
There is a debate happening rn on@Wikipediathat has the potential to * officially categorize NFTs as ‘not art’ on all of Wikipedia. *
Wikipedia is a global source of truth. Having NFTs categorized as ‘not art’ would be a disaster!
?:
— Duncan Cock Foster (@DCCockFoster)January 12, 2022
The debate highlights the confusion surrounding NFT artworks.
While digital artistsview NFTsas a medium for making and selling art, criticsdescribe themas merely“financial instruments.”
TheWikipedia editors agreed that Beeple and Pak are artists. However, some argued that buyingan NFT of an artworkisn’t the same as buying the artwork itself.
Another issue for Wikipedia involves the mechanisms of selling NFTs.
One editor said the sales of NFTs aren’t similar enough to other artwork sales to belong on the list.
As evidence, they pointed to doubts aboutthe record sale of Pak’sThe Merge. Critics have questioned claims that it’s the “largest-ever art sale by a living creator,” as the piece could be classified as a series of artworks.
The Wikipedia vote ultimately led to a new proposal from an editor: Beeple’sEverydayswould retain its place, albeit with the addition of a note about the suspicions around the sale. Pak’sTheMerge, however, would be excluded from the list:
The only source I have found which states it should be considered a singular artwork sale is a Nifty Gateway press release, the vendor who facilitated the sale. This is a primary source: it is not sufficient to qualify the item for inclusion.
That’s not likely to impress Nifty Gateway, although it does leave the door open for a potential inclusion.
The discussions still require a consensus supported by Wikipedia policy, but they’ve already exposed the skepticism — and bewilderment — around the NFT art world.
Story byThomas Macaulay
Thomas is a senior reporter at TNW. He covers European tech, with a focus on AI, cybersecurity, and government policy.Thomas is a senior reporter at TNW. He covers European tech, with a focus on AI, cybersecurity, and government policy.
Get the TNW newsletter
Get the most important tech news in your inbox each week.
