The vast majority of websites you visit now greet you with a pop-up. This annoying impediment to your seamless web browsing is called the “cookie banner”, and it’s there to secure your consent, as peronline privacy laws, for websites to retain information about you between browsing sessions.

The cookie banner purports to offer you a choice: consent to only the essential cookies that help maintain your browsing functionality, or accept them all – including cookies that track your browsing history to sell on to targeted advertising firms. Because those additional cookiesgenerate extra revenuefor the websites we visit, cookie banners are often designed to trick you into clicking “accept all”.

The UK’s information commissionerrecently urgedG7 countries to address this problem, highlighting how fatigued web users are agreeing to share more personal data than they’d like. But in truth,manipulative cookie bannersare just one example of what’s called “dark design” – the practice of creating user interfaces that are intentionally designed to trick or deceive the user.

Dark design has proven to be an incredibly effective way of encouraging web users to part with their time, money, and privacy. This in turn has established “dark patterns”, or sets of practices designers know they can use to manipulate web users. They’re difficult to spot, but they’re increasingly prevalent in the websites and apps we use every day, creating products that are manipulative by design, much like the persistent, ever-present pop-ups we’re forced to close when we visit a new website.

Calling all Scaleup founders! Join the Soonicorn Summit on November 28 in Amsterdam.

Meet with the leaders of Picnic, Miro, Carbon Equity and more during this exclusive event dedicated to Scaleup Founders!

Cookie banners remain the most obvious form of dark design. You’ll notice how the “accept all” button is large and cheerfully highlighted, attracting your cursor within a split second of your arrival on a website. Meanwhile, the dowdy, less prominent “confirm choices” or “manage settings” buttons – the ones through which we can protect our privacy – scare us away with more time-consuming clicks.

You’ll know from experience which one you tend to click. Or you can try theCookie Consent Speed-Run, an online game that exposes how difficult it is to click the right button in the face of dark design. E-commerce websites alsofrequently usedark patterns. Say you’ve found a competitively priced product you’d like to buy. You dutifully create an account, select your product specifications, input delivery details, click through to the payment page – and discover the final cost, including delivery, is mysteriously higher than you’d originally thought. These “hidden costs” aren’t accidental: the designer is hoping you’ll just hit “order” rather than spending even more time repeating the same process on another website.

Other elements of dark design are less obvious. Free services such as Facebook and YouTube monetize your attention by placing advertisements in front of you as you scroll, browse or watch. In this “attention economy”, the more you scroll or watch, the more money the companies make. So these platforms are intentionally optimized tocommand and retain your attention, even if you’d rather close the app and get on with your day. For example, the expertly crafted algorithm behind YouTube’s “Up Next” video suggestions can keep uswatching for hoursif we let them.

App design

Manipulating users for commercial gain isn’t just used on websites. Currently, more than95% of Android appson the Google Play store are free to download and use. Creating these apps is an expensive business, requiring teams of designers, developers, artists, and testers. But designers know that they’ll recoup this investment once we’re hooked on their “free” apps – and they do it using dark design.

Inrecent researchanalyzing free app-based games that are popular with today’s teenagers, my colleague and I identified dozens of examples of dark design. Users are forced to watch adverts and frequently encounter disguised adverts that look like part of the game. They’re prompted to share posts on social media and, as their friends join the game, are prompted to make in-app purchases to differentiate their character from those of their peers.

Some of this psychological manipulation seems inappropriate for younger users. Teenage girls’ susceptibility to peer influence is exploited to encourage them to buy clothes for in-game avatars. Some games promote unhealthy body imagery while others actively demonstrate andencourage bullyingthrough indirect aggression between characters.

There are mechanisms to protect young users from psychological manipulation, such as age rating systems,codes of practice, and guidance that specifically prohibits the use of dark design. But these rely on developers understanding and interpreting this guidance correctly and, in the case of theGoogle Play Store, developersvet their own workand it’s up to users to report any issues.My researchindicates that these measures are not yet proving entirely effective.

Shedding light

The problem with dark design is that it’s difficult to spot. And dark patterns, which are established in every developer’s toolbox, spread fast. They’re hard for designers to resist when free apps and websites are competing for our attention, judged on metrics like “time on page” and the “user conversion rate”.

So while cookie banners are annoying and often dishonest, we need to consider the broader implications of an online ecosystem that is increasingly manipulative by design. Dark design is used to influence our decisions about our time, our money, our personal data and our consent. But a critical understanding of how dark patterns work, and what they’re hoping to achieve, can help us detect and overcome their trickery.

Google had not replied to a request for comment on this story by the time it was published

Article byDaniel Fitton, Reader in User Experience Design,University of Central Lancashire

This article is republished fromThe Conversationunder a Creative Commons license. Read theoriginal article.

Story byThe Conversation

An independent news and commentary website produced by academics and journalists.An independent news and commentary website produced by academics and journalists.

Get the TNW newsletter

Get the most important tech news in your inbox each week.

Also tagged with