If you’re concerned about killer robots in the military, brace yourself for their arrival in civilian hands.
AI weapons will soon spread from battlefields to city streets, campaigners have warned, unless new global rules are imposed on the tech.
A UN conference this week can alleviate the fears.Ina Geneva meetingthat starts today, delegates will debate banning weapons that target people without“meaningful human control.”
Activists, however, are pessimistic about the outcome. Whilesome countrieshave endorsed new laws, the world’s leading military powers don’t appear enthusiastic.
Calling all Scaleup founders! Join the Soonicorn Summit on November 28 in Amsterdam.
Meet with the leaders of Picnic, Miro, Carbon Equity and more during this exclusive event dedicated to Scaleup Founders!
The US, for instance, has rebuffed calls to regulate lethal autonomous weapons (LAWs). Instead, American officialshave proposeddeveloping “a non-binding code of conduct.” This may outline some principles of use, but there would be no legal obligations to abide by them.
China and Russia have also shown little appetite for a global treaty. As the UN meeting requires a unanimous agreement on any new rules, the prospects of meaningful restrictions look bleak.
Ultimately, the opposition to new rules may prove self-destructive.
“The biggest losers from this are going to be countries that are militarily dominant, because these weapons are incredibly cheap,” Max Tegmark, anAIresearcher at MIT and co-founder ofthe Future of Life Insitute (FLI), told TNW.
“They’ll be small, cheap and light like smartphones, and incredibly versatile and powerful. It’s clearly not in the national security interest of these countries to legalize super-powerful weapons of mass destruction.”
The FLI hasproduced a filmthat envisions the future of these unregulated “slaughterbots.”
The images are nightmarish. They depict mass executions at polling stations, killerrobotsused in heists, and drones withfacial recognitiontargeting both individuals and specific demographic groups.
This dystopian vision could one day become a reality. LAWsmay have already killed soldierswithout gaining permission from a human operator. In the future,Tegmark expects most of the weapons to be used by and on civilians:
If you can buy slaughterbots for the same price as an AK-47, that’s much preferable for drug cartels, because you’re not going to get caught anymore when you kill someone.
It’s also much more effective for penetrating defenses. Even if a judge has lots of bodyguards, you can fly in through a bedroom window while they’re sleeping and kill them… And it’s going to go far beyond that. Because pretty soon anyone who wants to knock off anyone for any reason will be able to do this.
While Tegmark doesn’t expect a global ban to emerge this week, he believes individual nations may gradually sign up to new rules. In time, he hopes LAWs become so stigmatized that every military power is pressured to agree on prohibitions. If they don’t, AI weapons of mass destruction may enter the mainstream.
Story byThomas Macaulay
Thomas is a senior reporter at TNW. He covers European tech, with a focus on AI, cybersecurity, and government policy.Thomas is a senior reporter at TNW. He covers European tech, with a focus on AI, cybersecurity, and government policy.
Get the TNW newsletter
Get the most important tech news in your inbox each week.
